Priced for access, not results
I had a thought.
Every founder I meet has a pricing model. Per seat, monthly subscription, freemium with a pro tier. Picked in week two, before the first user. Before the first sale.
I ask why. The answer is usually the same. "That's what Notion does." Or "subscription gives stable MRR." Or "it's the standard."
But pricing isn't packaging. Pricing is the deepest statement you make about value. It defines what your customer buys, what they expect, when they feel ripped off.
And yet most founders decide it at the moment they know the least. Before they know what their customer actually values. Before they know what outcome the product even delivers.
Look at what each model actually measures. Per seat measures headcount. Subscription measures time. Usage measures activity. Each one charges for a proxy for value. Not value itself.
Only one model charges for the thing the customer came for. Outcome. Results. Did it work.
And notice how rare that is. Notice how the entire industry has built itself around selling access to the possibility of a result, without ever having to prove one.
Outcomes are hard to measure. That's the easy reason. The harder one is that most products would not survive the test.
If your customer would only pay for proven results tomorrow, what would change about your product?
Take it further
I want to question whether my pricing model actually charges for value, or just for something adjacent to it. Don't give me pricing tactics or benchmarks. Start by asking me: if my customer would only pay for proven results tomorrow, what would change about my product? Then help me find the honest answer.